| The consensus paradox: Does deliberative agreement impede rational discourse? H Friberg-Fernros, JK Schaffer Political studies 62 (1_suppl), 99-116, 2014 | 63 | 2014 |
| A Critique of R ob L overing's Criticism of the S ubstance V iew H Friberg‐Fernros Bioethics 29 (3), 211-216, 2015 | 23 | 2015 |
| Within the limits of the defensible: a response to Simkulet’s argument against the pro-life view on the basis of spontaneous abortion H Friberg-Fernros Journal of medical ethics 44 (11), 743-745, 2018 | 17 | 2018 |
| Assessing the epistemic quality of democratic decision-making in terms of adequate support for conclusions H Friberg-Fernros, JK Schaffer Social epistemology 31 (3), 251-265, 2017 | 16 | 2017 |
| abortion and the Limits of Political Liberalism H Friberg-Fernros Public Reason 2 (1), 27-42, 2010 | 13 | 2010 |
| The responsibility to protect–An incoherent doctrine? H Friberg-Fernros, D Brommesson International Politics 50, 600-622, 2013 | 12 | 2013 |
| Allies in tension: Identifying and bridging the rift between R2P and just war H Friberg-Fernros Journal of Military Ethics 10 (3), 160-173, 2011 | 12 | 2011 |
| Deliberation after consensus: introduction to the symposium H Friberg-Fernros, JK Schaffer, C Holst Journal of Deliberative Democracy 15 (1), 2019 | 10 | 2019 |
| Defending the two tragedies argument: a response to Simkulet H Friberg-Fernros Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (6), 417-418, 2019 | 8 | 2019 |
| The feasibility of an expanded regime on the use of force: the case of the responsibility to protect D Brommesson, HF Fernros Journal of international relations and development 16, 138-166, 2013 | 8 | 2013 |
| Hit but not down. The substance view in light of the criticism of Lovering and Simkulet H Friberg‐Fernros Bioethics 32 (6), 388-394, 2018 | 7 | 2018 |
| Individualisation and destabilisation of the international order. The case of the responsibility to protect D Brommesson, HF Fernros International Review of Sociology 19 (2), 315-330, 2009 | 6 | 2009 |
| The explanatory power of the soul: Why liberals should seriously consider dualism H Friberg‐Fernros Journal of Religious Ethics 48 (1), 101-121, 2020 | 5 | 2020 |
| The consensus paradox: Why deliberative agreement impedes rational discourse H Friberg-Fernros, JK Schaffer Oslo-Paris International Workshop on Democracy, Paris, October, 18-20, 2014 | 5 | 2014 |
| Taking precautionary concerns seriously: A defense of a misused anti-abortion argument H Friberg-Fernros The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy …, 2014 | 5 | 2014 |
| I gränslandet till liv och död. Om människovärdet och den offentliga maktens koherens H Friberg-Fernros | 5 | 2008 |
| Media and the power of naming: An experimental study of racist, xenophobic and nationalist party labels H Friberg-Fernros, M Demker, J Martinsson Ethnicities 17 (5), 727-745, 2017 | 4 | 2017 |
| Making a case for stricter abortion laws H Friberg-Fernros Springer, 2017 | 4 | 2017 |
| Clashes of consensus: on the problem of both justifying abortion of fetuses with Down syndrome and rejecting infanticide H Friberg-Fernros Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 38 (3), 195-212, 2017 | 4 | 2017 |
| Respect, Coercion, and Religious Reasons: Toward a Post‐Secular Deliberative Approach H Friberg‐Fernros Journal of Religious Ethics 44 (3), 445-471, 2016 | 2 | 2016 |
