| Institutional adaptation to climate change: flood responses at the municipal level in Norway LO Naess, G Bang, S Eriksen, J Vevatne Global Environmental Change 15 (2), 125-138, 2005 | 643 | 2005 |
| Energy security and climate change concerns: Triggers for energy policy change in the United States? G Bang Energy policy 38 (4), 1645-1653, 2010 | 302 | 2010 |
| Why the United States did not become a party to the Kyoto Protocol: German, Norwegian, and US perspectives J Hovi, DF Sprinz, G Bang European Journal of International Relations 18 (1), 129-150, 2012 | 151 | 2012 |
| The Paris Agreement: Short-term and long-term effectiveness G Bang, J Hovi, T Skodvin | 98 | 2016 |
| From oil as welfare to oil as risk? Norwegian petroleum resource governance and climate policy G Bang, B Lahn Climate Policy 20 (8), 997-1009, 2020 | 74 | 2020 |
| The United States and international climate cooperation: international “pull” versus domestic “push” G Bang, CB Froyn, J Hovi, FC Menz Energy Policy 35 (2), 1282-1291, 2007 | 67 | 2007 |
| US presidents and the failure to ratify multilateral environmental agreements G Bang, J Hovi, DF Sprinz Climate policy 12 (6), 755-763, 2012 | 64 | 2012 |
| California’s cap-and-trade system: diffusion and lessons G Bang, DG Victor, S Andresen Global Environmental Politics 17 (3), 12-30, 2017 | 63 | 2017 |
| Explaining growing climate policy differences between the European Union and the United States JB Skjærseth, G Bang, MA Schreurs Global Environmental Politics 13 (4), 61-80, 2013 | 59 | 2013 |
| The domestic politics of global climate change: Key actors in international climate cooperation G Bang, A Underdal Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015 | 48 | 2015 |
| Signed but not ratified: Limits to US participation in international environmental agreements G Bang Review of Policy Research 28 (1), 65-81, 2011 | 46 | 2011 |
| Future US climate policy: International re-engagement? G Bang, A Tjernshaugen, S Andresen International Studies Perspectives 6 (2), 285-303, 2005 | 43 | 2005 |
| Shifting strategies in the global climate negotiations G Bang, G Heggelund, J Vevatne CICERO Report, 2005 | 40 | 2005 |
| Look to S weden: The Making of a New Renewable Energy Support Scheme in N orway AT Gullberg, G Bang Scandinavian Political Studies 38 (1), 95-114, 2015 | 30 | 2015 |
| A Green New Deal: framing US climate leadership G Bang, MA Schreurs The European Union as a leader in international climate change politics, 255-271, 2010 | 29 | 2010 |
| Enforcing the Kyoto Protocol: can punitive consequences restore compliance? J Hovi, CB Froyn, G Bang Review of International Studies 33 (3), 435-449, 2007 | 29 | 2007 |
| Sources of influence in climate change policymaking: A comparative analysis of Norway, Germany and the United States G Bang Department of Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, 2004 | 29 | 2004 |
| The challenge of global climate leadership in a politically divided state G Bang, MA Schreurs The European Union in international climate change politics: Still taking a …, 2016 | 18 | 2016 |
| The Paris agreement and key actors’ domestic climate policy mixes: comparative patterns JB Skjærseth, S Andresen, G Bang, GM Heggelund International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 21, 59-73, 2021 | 16 | 2021 |
| The United States: conditions for accelerating decarbonisation in a politically divided country G Bang International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 21 (1 …, 2021 | 16 | 2021 |
