| Philosophical bias is the one bias that science cannot avoid F Andersen, RL Anjum, E Rocca Elife 8, e44929, 2019 | 64 | 2019 |
| How biological background assumptions influence scientific risk evaluation of stacked genetically modified plants: an analysis of research hypotheses and argumentations E Rocca, F Andersen | 19 | 2017 |
| Metaphysics within science: Against radical naturalism F Andersen, JR Becker Arenhart Metaphilosophy 47 (2), 159-180, 2016 | 16 | 2016 |
| Underdetermination and evidence-based policy F Andersen, E Rocca Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and …, 2020 | 6 | 2020 |
| Experience and theory: a defense of the kantian a priori and Kepler’s philosophy of science in light of modern space-time physics F Andersen Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, 2017 | 3 | 2017 |
| Nudging, hva er det og bør vi benytte oss av det? F Andersen, A Dechsling | 2 | 2021 |
| Causation and quantum mechanics F Andersen, RL Anjum, S Mumford What Tends to Be: The Philosophy of Dispositional Modality, 64-83, 2018 | 2 | 2018 |
| Negotiating Consensus for Diverging Evidence. An Application of the Explanatory Approach to Guidelines for the Treatment of Substance Use Disorders and Addiction F Andersen, Y Herikstad, S Sütterlin, A Dechsling Evidence Contestation Dealing with Dissent in Knowledge Societies, 167-191, 2023 | | 2023 |
Elena RoccaNorwegian University of Life SciencesVerified email at nmbu.no
