| Right or wrong? The brain's fast response to morally objectionable statements JJA Van Berkum, B Holleman, M Nieuwland, M Otten, J Murre Psychological science 20 (9), 1092-1099, 2009 | 295 | 2009 |
| Beyond young, highly educated males: a typology of VAA users J Van de Pol, B Holleman, N Kamoen, A Krouwel, C De Vreese Journal of Information Technology & Politics 11 (4), 397-411, 2014 | 84 | 2014 |
| The forbid/allow asymmetry: On the cognitive mechanisms underlying wording effects in surveys B Holleman The forbid/allow asymmetry, 2000 | 73* | 2000 |
| The pragmatics of profiling: Framing effects in text interpretation and text production BC Holleman, HLWP Maat Journal of Pragmatics 41 (11), 2204-2221, 2009 | 72 | 2009 |
| The effect of voting advice applications on political knowledge and vote choice N Kamoen, B Holleman, A Krouwel, J Van de Pol, C De Vreese Electoral Management: Institutions and Practices in an Established Democracy …, 2018 | 67 | 2018 |
| Agree or disagree? Cognitive processes in answering contrastive survey questions N Kamoen, B Holleman, P Mak, T Sanders, H Van Den Bergh Discourse Processes 48 (5), 355-385, 2011 | 65 | 2011 |
| Wording effects in survey research using meta-analysis to explain the forbid/allow asymmetry B Holleman Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 6 (1), 29-40, 1999 | 63 | 1999 |
| Positive vs. negative: The impact of question polarity in voting advice applications B Holleman, N Kamoen, A Krouwel, J Pol, C Vreese PloS one 11 (10), e0164184, 2016 | 53 | 2016 |
| Positive, negative, and bipolar questions: The effect of question polarity on ratings of text readability N Kamoen, B Holleman, H van den Bergh Survey Research Methods 7 (3), 169-179, 2013 | 49 | 2013 |
| The meanings of ‘yes’ and ‘no’. An explanation for the forbid/allow asymmetry BC Holleman Quality and Quantity 40, 1-38, 2006 | 42 | 2006 |
| Answering attitudinal questions: Modelling the response process underlying contrastive questions AG Chessa, BC Holleman Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for …, 2007 | 41 | 2007 |
| Why are negative questions difficult to answer? On the processing of linguistic contrasts in surveys N Kamoen, B Holleman, P Mak, T Sanders, H Van Den Bergh Public Opinion Quarterly 81 (3), 613-635, 2017 | 39 | 2017 |
| The nature of the forbid/allow asymmetry: Two correlational studies B Holleman Sociological Methods & Research 28 (2), 209-244, 1999 | 37 | 1999 |
| I don’t get it. Response difficulties in answering political attitude statements in Voting Advice Applications. N Kamoen, B Holleman Survey Research Methods 11 (2), 125-140, 2017 | 31 | 2017 |
| Allergen labelling: current practice and improvement from a communication perspective WM Blom, LM van Dijk, A Michelsen‐Huisman, GF Houben, AC Knulst, ... Clinical & experimental allergy 51 (4), 574-584, 2021 | 28 | 2021 |
| Poor understanding of allergen labelling by allergic and non‐allergic consumers BC Holleman, H van Os‐Medendorp, H van den Bergh, LM van Dijk, ... Clinical & Experimental Allergy 51 (10), 1374-1382, 2021 | 25 | 2021 |
| Hoe makkelijk is een niet moeilijke tekst?: Een meta-analyse naar het effect van vraagformulering in tekstevaluatieonderzoek N Kamoen, B Holleman, H Van den Bergh Tijdschrift voor taalbeheersing 29 (4), 314-332, 2007 | 22 | 2007 |
| Forbid/allow Asymmetry Holleman BRILL, 2000 | 22 | 2000 |
| Stemadvies via internet: antwoorden, attitudes en stemintenties B Holleman, N Kamoen, C de Vreese Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing 35 (1), 25-46, 2013 | 17 | 2013 |
| Absolutely relative or relatively absolute? The linguistic behavior of gradable adjectives and degree modifiers N Kamoen, B Holleman, R Nouwen, T Sanders, H van den Bergh Journal of pragmatics 43 (13), 3139-3151, 2011 | 16 | 2011 |
Naomi KamoenTilburg UniversityVerified email at tilburguniversity.edu
